U Sports Hoops — Men |
University Basketball in Canada |
provided by Martin Timmerman |
U SPORTS Final 8 Selection Criteria for the At-large Berth
The section below that details the criteria for the at-large berth was retrieved March 6, 2022 from the
U Sports website at the URL
Playing Regulations 2021-22 Season.
The applicable section has reduced the number of criteria from previous years and says:
4.2.3 SELECTION CRITERIA FOR THE AT-LARGE BERTH
A Selection Committee will use the following five (5) criteria to determine the at-large
berth for the 2021-2022 season ONLY. The committee will consider the
performance of each team in each criterion and rank them accordingly. The committee
has a degree of discretion in its rankings within each criterion. For example, the
committee may consider a regular season record of 19-1 to be equal to a 21-1 record even
though 21-1 is mathematically superior.
- Final regular season conference record.
- Strength of schedule (using RPI).
- Top 10 rankings: Take the average ranking of the teams placing in the Top 10s
for the season.
- Play-off Performance.
- Games vs. other teams under berth consideration and teams that have already
qualified for the national championship (if required).
Note: There are inherent challenges in simply comparing at face value how deep a team
advanced into the play-offs in one conference to another conference without looking
at the nuances and making some distinctions and judgments. Out of consideration to
the number of teams in each conference, the at-large berth applicants' play-off
performance will be reviewed and sorted into clusters.
The top cluster will consist of:
- The RSEQ and AUS applicants that advanced to the play-off final and lost in the final.
(The 2nd placed team in the play-offs out of 5 teams in the RSEQ)
(The 2nd placed team in the play-offs out of 8 teams in the AUS)
- The OUA and Canada West applicants that advanced to the semi-finals.
(The 3rd or 4th ranked team from the Final 4 out of 17 teams in Canada West)
(The 3rd or 4th ranked team in the OUA play-offs out of 18 teams in OUA)
The second cluster will consist of:
- The RSEQ and AUS applicant who won the bronze medal or who lost in the semi-finals
if no bronze medal exists.
(3rd or 4th team out of 5 in RSEQ)
- The Canada West applicant who lost in the divisional final.
- The OUA applicant who just missed out of the semi-finals (5th out of 18)
Teams Already Qualified for U SPORTS Final 8
Team | League | How qualified |
Victoria | Canada West West | Canada West Champion |
Brock | OUA West | OUA Champion |
McGill | RSEQ | RSEQ Champion |
Dalhousie | AUS | AUS Champion |
Alberta | Canada West Central | Canada West Representative |
Queens | OUA East | OUA Representative |
Saskatchewan | Canada West East | Host Team |
1) Regular season conference record
Pos | Team | League | W-L Record | Percentage |
1 | Carleton
| OUA East | 14-0 | 1.000 |
2 | UBC
| Canada West West | 16-2 | 0.889 |
3 | Ottawa
| OUA East | 13-3 | 0.812 |
4 | Regina
| Canada West East | 12-4 | 0.750 |
5 | McMaster
| OUA West | 11-5 | 0.688 |
6 | UPEI
| AUS | 7-7 | 0.500 |
3) Average Top 10 ranking for the season (assigned #12 if not in Top 10 a specific week)
Pos | Team | Average |
1 | Carleton
| 1.23 |
2 | Ottawa
| 3.23 |
3 | UBC
| 7.05 |
4 | Regina
| 11.55 |
5 | McMaster
| 11.91 |
6 | UPEI
| 12.00 |
5) Games versus other teams under berth consideration or already qualified
Pos | Team | Win | Loss | Pct | Games |
1 | Carleton
| 8 | 2 | 0.800 | L-Regina W-McGill W-Ottawa W-Ottawa W-Queens W-Queens L-Queens W-Victoria W-Alberta W-Saskatchewan |
2 | Regina
| 4 | 4 | 0.500 | W-Carleton L-Alberta W-Saskatchewan W-Saskatchewan W-Saskatchewan L-Saskatchewan L-Victoria L-Saskatchewan |
3 | Ottawa
| 3 | 3 | 0.500 | W-McGill W-Queens W-Queens L-Carleton L-Carleton L-Queens |
4 | UPEI
| 1 | 2 | 0.333 | L-Dalhousie W-Dalhousie L-Dalhousie |
5 | McMaster
| 1 | 2 | 0.333 | L-Brock W-Brock L-Brock |
6 | UBC
| 1 | 4 | 0.200 | L-Alberta W-Victoria L-Victoria L-Victoria L-Saskatchewan |
Statistical information maintained by Martin Timmerman.
Please provide feedback to:
MartinTimmerman@gmail.com